Analyze the document Details on article
| Id | 2261 | |
| Author | Brewster L.; Cox A.M. |
|
| Title | Taking a ‘whole-university’ approach to student mental health: the contribution of academic libraries | |
| Reference | Brewster L.; Cox A.M. Taking a ‘whole-university’ approach to student mental health: the contribution of academic libraries,Higher Education Research and Development 42 1 |
Keywords |
| Link to article | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85126196167&doi=10.1080%2f07294360.2022.2043249&partnerID=40&md5=f8680bfe4b41f38b7d2c627922a7447f |
|
| Abstract | As concerns about student mental health have increased, policy aims have moved towards a ‘whole-university’ approach. The 2017 Universities UK #Stepchange framework made this principle a formal part of policy initiatives and legitimises it via its calls for action. The policy distributes responsibility for mental health support across the institution, highlighting four key reasons for intervention: risk, regulation, success and policy. However, little is known about how this policy has been translated into practice and how activities for mental health have been adopted into the everyday work of higher education (HE) institutions. This article explores how one service common across all HE institutions, the academic library, has interpreted this call to contribute to student mental health. Using data from a national UK survey alongside policy analysis, this article investigates the strategic rationale and the practicalities of engaging with a whole-university approach. Findings show that local concerns often drove activity, which could be mapped to some aspects of a whole-university approach, but that the boundaries of professional expertise and resources were key considerations in accepting distributed responsibility. More broadly, mental health support was recontextualised to include wellbeing; this made it easier to adopt some aspects of a whole-university approach but focused on prevention rather than risk and regulation. As a result, activities being conducted in practice did not align directly with the whole-university approach. © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. |
|
| Metodology | ||
| DOI | 10.1080/07294360.2022.2043249 | |
| Search Database | Scopus |
|
| Technique | ||
MESOC has received funding
from Horizon 2020 - the EU Framework Programme
for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) -
under Grant Agreement n°870935.
We take your privacy seriously and WE DO NOT process any personal data or any information that reveals personal identity or information that can be linked to such information to identify directly or indirectly.
2021 © CD