FIND IMPACT FOR ARTICLE

Analyze article and determine social impact





Id : 107

Author :
Evans, G.,

Title


Measure for measure: evaluating the evidence of culture’s contribution to regeneration.

Reference :


Evans, G. (2005). Measure for measure: evaluating the evidence of culture’s contribution to regeneration. Urban Studies, 42, 5/6: 959‑83.

Link to article https://doi.org/10.1080%2F00420980500107102
Abstract ;Culture-led regeneration, as it has come to be known, is now a feature of cities—old and new—as they seek to revive former industrial and waterfront sites and city centres, and establish themselves as competitive cities of culture. At the same time, the rationale for cultural input to area and neighbourhood regeneration has been extended to include quality of life, as well economic outcomes. The evidence of how far flagship and major cultural projects contribute to a range of regeneration objectives is, however, limited. Measuring the social, economic and environmental impacts attributed to the cultural element in area regeneration is problematic and the ‘evidence’ is seldom robust. The paper reviews both evidence and the indicators used to measure impacts and concludes with an assessment of how and why gaps in evidence persist.



Results:


                            Impact                            

                   Certainity                   

Health_and_Wellbeing

0.0458
Urban_and_Territorial_Renovation 0.8780
Peoples_Engagement_and_Participation 0.0433
Note: Due to lack of computing power, results have been previously created and saved in database