FIND IMPACT FOR ARTICLE

Analyze article and determine social impact





Id : 2982

Author :
Araabi H.F.

Title


Commentary: beauty in urban design - oppression or emancipation?

Reference :


Araabi H.F. Commentary: beauty in urban design - oppression or emancipation?,Urban Design International

Link to article https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85137606215&doi=10.1057%2fs41289-022-00202-z&partnerID=40&md5=b437a7be70bc297c17a0a8ab024ddce9
Abstract In this commentary, I respond to Cozzolino’s (URBAN Des Int 27(1):43–52, 2022) recent paper titled ‘On the spontaneous beauty of cities: neither design nor chaos’ published in URBAN DESIGN International. In the last few years, the concept of beauty has been used widely in urban planning and design. Cozzolino’s notable contribution is a call for more diverse processes of creating grown/spontaneous order in planning and designing cities. He proposes this as a definition of beauty that can enable people to better express themselves. Here, I use debates from cultural studies to situate the notion of beauty within a broader critical context. Reasons why urban design research must take into consideration the ways in which beauty disproportionately affects different groups of people (particularly marginalised groups) are then explained. The aim is to highlight the potential discriminatory consequences of seemingly apolitical approaches taken to create beauty. This is in line with broader movements of the decolonisation of knowledge. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.



Results:


                            Impact                            

                   Certainity                   

Health and Wellbeing

0.0083
Urban and Territorial Renovation 0.0913
Peoples Engagement and Participation 0.9069
Note: Due to lack of computing power, results have been previously created and saved in database