Analyze the document Details on article
| Id | 504 | |
| Author | Smith C.P., George D. |
|
| Title | When is advertising a plastic surgeon’s individual “brand” unethical? | |
| Reference | Smith C.P., George D.; When is advertising a plastic surgeon’s individual “brand” unethical? ;AMA Journal of Ethics vol:20 issue: 4 page:372.0 |
Keywords |
| Link to article | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85062774677&doi=10.1001%2fjournalofethics.2018.20.4.msoc2-1804&partnerID=40&md5=8b5dfdaf41d15efaa7cd6f30d6adb262 |
|
| Abstract | Advertising a plastic surgery practice on social media is fraught with both practical and ethical challenges. We use an institutional betrayal framework to explore the range of potential harms to patient well-being while also considering the pitfalls of social media activity, especially marketing, for practitioners. We also give consideration to the relative benefits that such online patient-clinician relationships can provide. In our analysis, we draw on specific examples of plastic surgery procedures prominently featured on social media, including the Vampire Facelift ® Copyright 2018 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. |
|
| Metodology | ||
| DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.4.msoc2-1804 | |
| Search Database | SC (Scopus) |
|
| Technique | ||
MESOC has received funding
from Horizon 2020 - the EU Framework Programme
for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) -
under Grant Agreement n°870935.
We take your privacy seriously and WE DO NOT process any personal data or any information that reveals personal identity or information that can be linked to such information to identify directly or indirectly.
2021 © CD