Details on article
Id | 718 | |
Author | Chatterjee H.J., Camic P.M. | |
Title | The health and well-being potential of museums and art galleries | |
Reference | Chatterjee H.J., Camic P.M.; The health and well-being potential of museums and art galleries ;Arts and Health vol:7 issue: 3 page:183.0 |
Keywords |
Link to article | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84940187301&doi=10.1080%2f17533015.2015.1065594&partnerID=40&md5=9e38798e30e371f6c68b9c332a0fe4ea |
|
Abstract | Participation in creative cultural activities has received increasing attention by
researchers and policy makers and is considered by some as an important new focus
for public heath programmes and research (Clift & Camic, 2015; Cuypers et al., 2012;
O’Neil, 2010). In recent years, many museums, including art galleries, have broadened
their services to include those directed towards improving health and well-being. The
museums sector has responded to the global trend of increased awareness of health
and well-being challenges by creating programmes for older adults, people with
dementia and mental health service users, to name but a few (Chatterjee & Noble,
2013). In the United States, for example, the Museum of Modern Art established the
first known art gallery-based programme for people with dementia and their family
caregivers (Rosenberg, 2009), whilst in Europe, London’s Dulwich Picture Gallery has
one of the most longstanding and comprehensive programmes for older people (Harper
& Hamblin, 2010), which includes a ‘art on prescription’ programme with local area
physicians.
A growing body of evidence suggests that cultural participation enhances human
health and well-being (e.g. Bygren et al., 2009; Camic & Chatterjee, 2013; Clift et al.,
2009; Konlaan, Bygren, & Johansson, 2000; Napier et al., 2014; Staricoff, 2004, 2006;
Staricoff, Duncan, Wright, Loppert, & Scott, 2001); however, robust studies regarding
the efficacy of museum encounters are limited (Chatterjee & Noble, 2013).
Notwithstanding this shortfall, when analysed and valued in a multi-dimensional,
multi-attribute and multi-value socio-economic environment, cultural heritage is widely
accepted as an important facet of society in providing cultural references for populations
and local communities, and also as an economic asset that provides jobs through
tourism (Mazzanti, 2002). |
|
Metodology | ||
Findings | ||
Open Access | ||
DOI | 10.1080/17533015.2015.1065594 | |
Search Database | SC (Scopus) |
|
Technique | ||