Analysis of article using Artificial Intelligence tools
|Author||Tavano Blessi, G.; Grossi, E.; Sacco, P. L.; Piereti, G.; Ferilli, G.|
|Title||The contribution of cultural participation to urban well-being. A comparative study in Bolzano/Bozen and Siracusa, Italy|
Tavano Blessi, G.; Grossi, E.; Sacco, P. L.; Piereti, G.; Ferilli, G. (2016). The contribution of cultural participation to urban well‑being. A comparative study in Bolzano/Bozen and Siracusa, Italy. Cities, 50, 216–226.
|Keywords||urban areas; culture; well-being; social welfare; cultural poverty trap; cultural policy
|Link to article|| https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.10.009
|Abstract||What is the role of culture in contemporary urban life? Can culture function as an urban planning tool for individual and social well-being? Two elements are of special relevance in this regard: cultural vibrancy in terms of level of initiative in policies, use of facilities and activities, and individual and social propensities towards the participation in, and consumption of, cultural activities and goods. This paper takes the recent path of research on the impact of cultural participation on the social and economic sustainability of urban processes, with a specific focus on the individual subjective well-being dimension. Two Italian cities, one endowed with a high stock of cultural facilities, activities, and access (Bolzano/Bozen) and the other with a comparatively much lower stock in all respects (Siracusa), are examined. Comparative analysis suggests that the impact of culture on subjective well-being in a context of high cultural supply and substantial cultural participation is much more relevant with respect to low-endowment and low-participation cases, thus suggesting the possibility of a culture/well-being positive feedback dynamics leading to urban ‘cultural poverty traps’. On the basis of these results, we draw some implications for cultural policy design in urban contexts.
|Metodology||A cross-sectional survey of the main socio-demographic characteristics such as gender, age, education, income, diseases, employment, and civil status, which are listed as major well-being determinants in the subjective well-being literature, together with participation in cultural activities, was undertaken in the autumn of 2010 on a relatively large sample (750 polled) of residents living in both urban areas. CATI system. The sampling universe is stratified according to region and size of city of residence. A multi-step random sampling method was adopted to draw a large representative sample for both cities.The survey has been modeled on the PGWBI (Psychological General Well-Being Index), an instrument specifically targeted in order to measure individual subjective well-being, employed for the evaluation of the impact of different subjective well-being determinants. As for cultural variables, they have been selected so as to guarantee extensive coverage of cultural activities in accordance with the guidelines from the literature on cultural participation and thanks to a survey of a panel of 110 academics undertaken in 2008.
||Technique||Literature review; questionnaire; PGWBI index|