FIND CATEGORY FOR ARTICLE

Analyze article and determine cultural category





Id : 2129

Author :
Leroy C.; Kammerer Y.

Title


Reading multiple documents on a health-related issue: the roles of a text-highlighting tool and re-reading behaviour in integrated understanding

Reference :


Leroy C.; Kammerer Y. Reading multiple documents on a health-related issue: the roles of a text-highlighting tool and re-reading behaviour in integrated understanding,Behaviour and Information Technology

Link to article https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85138324172&doi=10.1080%2f0144929X.2022.2118077&partnerID=40&md5=23c1bdbfa3b985dbe6a747403cca536e
Abstract This study aimed to investigate the roles of a text-highlighting tool and readers’ re-reading behaviour in their integrated understanding of multiple documents. University students (N = 95) read five partly conflicting documents on a health-related issue on a touch display with or without a text-highlighting tool. Integrated understanding of documents was assessed by the number of intertextual connections in essays written after reading and by a source-content mapping task. The provision of the text-highlighting tool resulted in longer initial reading times even when subtracting the time taken for highlighting, but shorter re-reading times, particularly for participants with a high number of re-readings. Further, only for participants with a high number of re-readings, the provision of the text-highlighting tool resulted in more intertextual connections than when no text-highlighting tool was provided. Participants’ source-content integration was positively related to the number of re-readings, regardless of whether the text-highlighting tool was provided. Finally, additional exploratory eye-tracking analyses revealed that for two out of the five documents, participants in the with-highlighting condition focused on significantly smaller parts of the documents during re-reading than controls. © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.



Results:


                    Category                    

             Certainity            
Heritage 0.0000
Archives 0.0000
Libraries 0.0001
Book and Press 0.9993
Visual Arts 0.0000
Performing Arts 0.0003
Audiovisual and Multimedia 0.0003
Architecture 0.0000
Adverstizing 0.0000
Art crafts 0.0000
General cultural dimension 0.0000
Note: Due to lack of computing power, results have been previously created and saved in database