FIND IMPACT FOR ARTICLE

Analyze article and determine social impact





Id : 213

Author :
Bianchini, F., ; Tommarchi, E., ; Hansen, L., E.

Title


Problematising the question of participation in Capitals of Culture

Reference :


Tommarchi, E., Hansen, L. E., & Bianchini, F. (2018). Problematising the question of participation in Capitals of Culture. Participations: Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 15(2), 154-169.

Link to article https://participations.org/Volume%2015/Issue%202/10.pdf
Abstract Participation is increasingly a common feature in both Capital and City of Culture (CoC) programmes such as European Capitals of Culture (ECoC) and UK Cities of Culture (UKCoC). Since the mid-1990s and in particular in the last decade, many ECoCs have been displaying an emphasis on audience development and cultural engagement, impacting both on the balance of their cultural programming and on the design of specific projects and events with the aim of engaging local communities. This development that seems to be putting participation at the centre of both ECoCs and UKCoCs, at least at rhetorical level, is the motivation behind this Themed Section of Participations. Why has it become increasingly important and how is participation understood and practiced in the different local versions of CoCs? And how can participation in CoCs be understood in the context of both a broad societal participatory turn and a narrower participatory turn in cultural policy and in the practices of cultural institutions? This Themed Section does not give a simple and conclusive answer to these questions, but it offers partial, case-based examples and can be seen as the first step towards a better understanding of why, how and to what extent CoCs are participatory. In this editorial introduction, we map the landscape in which the specific cases presented in the articles are positioned. We look at the emergence and development of the agenda of participation in mainly the ECoC scheme and we identify some of the challenges that future research needs to address.



Results:


                            Impact                            

                   Certainity                   

Health_and_Wellbeing

0.0033
Urban_and_Territorial_Renovation 0.0043
Peoples_Engagement_and_Participation 0.9977
Note: Due to lack of computing power, results have been previously created and saved in database