| Id : | 2187 | |
Author : | Gustafsson C.; Ripp M. | |
Title | A metamodel for heritage-based urban recovery |
|
| Reference : | Gustafsson C.; Ripp M. A metamodel for heritage-based urban recovery,Built Heritage 6 1 |
|
| Link to article | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85144289090&doi=10.1186%2fs43238-022-00068-8&partnerID=40&md5=107e50ac6a6b0784ef8e6aeb809773be |
|
| Abstract | Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to discuss the potential transfer of a metamodel for heritage-based urban development (HBUD) in a postcrisis urban recovery scenario. Design/methodology/approach: After an introduction to the field of cultural heritage as a resource for urban development, the research question is elaborated, and the current understanding of urban heritage is explored. The use of the metamodel in a postcrisis urban recovery setting is described as a potential solution. The proposed metamodel is introduced along with the grounded theory and design research methodology through which it was developed. The specific qualities of metamodels and how they can contribute to the proposed use are highlighted. The scenario is then developed further, and specific ways in which the metamodel could contribute are elaborated. Finally, the metamodel is compared to other methods, such as the historic urban landscape (HUL) approach, and the limitations are discussed. Findings: The metamodel can potentially be used in a postcrisis urban recovery scenario. The metamodel cannot be used directly, owing to the nature of metamodels; however, it can be transferred to a specific context and help to structure successful heritage-based urban recovery (HBUR) processes. Practical limitations/implications: One limitation is that it can be difficult to understand the differences between models and metamodels. Only with a comprehensive understanding of the nature of metamodels can this metamodel be applied, for example, to select appropriate models for HBUR. The metamodel can help to ensure that all relevant ‘elements’ are part of the processes designed for HBUR and emphasise the need for thorough planning, or scoping, of such processes. Originality/value: Metamodelling has not previously been used for HBUD or HBUR. © 2022, The Author(s). |
Results:
| Impact |
Certainity |
| Health and Wellbeing | 0.0150 |
| Urban and Territorial Renovation | 0.1198 |
| Peoples Engagement and Participation | 0.7977 |
MESOC has received funding
from Horizon 2020 - the EU Framework Programme
for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) -
under Grant Agreement n°870935.
We take your privacy seriously and WE DO NOT process any personal data or any information that reveals personal identity or information that can be linked to such information to identify directly or indirectly.
2021 © CD