Analyze article and determine social impact
Id : | 2742 | |
Author : | Fossheim K.; Andersen J. | |
Title | The consequences of institutional design on collaborative arrangements’ power to influence urban freight policymaking |
|
Reference : | Fossheim K.; Andersen J. The consequences of institutional design on collaborative arrangements’ power to influence urban freight policymaking,Case Studies on Transport Policy 10 2 |
|
Link to article | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85132619113&doi=10.1016%2fj.cstp.2022.04.017&partnerID=40&md5=0600bfc4781c192fd67676782e9f55a0 |
|
Abstract | Collaborative governance is becoming increasingly important as a mode of urban freight policymaking. Bringing together actors from private and public sectors in forums makes it possible to move beyond general discussions of delivery challenges to the innovation of joint solutions and lasting improvements to the freight transport system. For such cross-sector collaborations to function, participants must experience a sense of power to influence policy. The institutional design, i.e., the inclusiveness of the collaboration and the interdependence between the participants, may condition this possibility. Consequently, this article investigates how the institutional design of collaborative arrangements associated with urban freight affects participants’ perceptions of power to influence policymaking. We interviewed 37 participants in three different collaborations in Oslo, Norway. The results indicate that institutional design affects participants’ perceptions of power to influence policymaking. Inclusive collaborations, in which participants are not interdependent, provide participants with the most power to influence policy, rather than exclusive collaborations, in which participants are highly interdependent. © 2022 World Conference on Transport Research Society |
Impact |
Certainity |
Health and Wellbeing | 0.0198 |
Urban and Territorial Renovation | 0.0377 |
Peoples Engagement and Participation | 0.9569 |