FIND IMPACT FOR ARTICLE

Analyze article and determine social impact





Id : 2812

Author :
Collier S.J.; Gruendel A.

Title


Design in government: City planning, space-making, and urban politics

Reference :


Collier S.J.; Gruendel A. Design in government: City planning, space-making, and urban politics,Political Geography 97

Link to article https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85130873735&doi=10.1016%2fj.polgeo.2022.102644&partnerID=40&md5=c500f0debffd32ba4aab51edec957757
Abstract In recent years, design has appeared in an ever-broadening range of government processes and projects, particularly in cities. What has design become, such that its methods and practices could be applied to urban planning and public administration? And what are the governmental problems that design methods and designers are being mobilized to address? This article answers these questions by tracing the tangled intersections of design, city planning, and urban administration in the last century. Through a genealogical analysis, it shows how a number of designers came to redefine design as a set of procedures for formulating and proposing solutions to “wicked problems.” This understanding of design—which developed in fields such as industrial and product design that were remote from government—has recently gained salience in public administration and city planning. In contrast to an influential geographical analysis of design as spectacular architecture that is divorced from any broad social objective, the article argues that design in government can be analyzed as the design of politics. Its concern is not with the aesthetic or functional qualities of material objects—whether a manufactured product, building, or article of clothing—but with the ongoing work of organizing argumentation and decision making about complex, large-scale problems. © 2022 The Authors



Results:


                            Impact                            

                   Certainity                   

Health and Wellbeing

0.0124
Urban and Territorial Renovation 0.0770
Peoples Engagement and Participation 0.9392
Note: Due to lack of computing power, results have been previously created and saved in database