FIND IMPACT FOR ARTICLE

Analyze article and determine social impact





Id : 3051

Author :
Gaete Cruz M.; Ersoy A.; Czischke D.; van Bueren E.

Title


Towards a framework for urban landscape co-design: Linking the participation ladder and the design cycle

Reference :


Gaete Cruz M.; Ersoy A.; Czischke D.; van Bueren E. Towards a framework for urban landscape co-design: Linking the participation ladder and the design cycle,CoDesign

Link to article https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85142631965&doi=10.1080%2f15710882.2022.2123928&partnerID=40&md5=0679f103970a8e3b314fe178cc97be7c
Abstract With the increasing social and ecological pressures on urban settlements, re-thinking how we produce them becomes a growing concern. Due to the diversity of actors across sectors and backgrounds involved in such design processes, collaboration is of utmost importance. Co-design can thus play a crucial role in integrating aims and knowledge as an evolving institutional process toward feasible, suitable and legitimate projects. While many studies on co-design focus on one-time activities, little attention is paid to conceptualising how such processes occur, involving several actors in dynamic participatory ways. We propose a Co-Design Framework and suggest that collaboration is achieved at many levels within different design steps in the process. Analysing three Chilean public space co-design processes through the lens of our framework, we highlight the intrinsic diversity of such an approach. This study posits that three co-design arenas interact (strategic, transdisciplinary, and socio-cultural) according to their main aims to enable, inform, and legitimise the projects accordingly. Our framework contributes to conceptualising and analyzing co-design and may also be useful to plan and develop such processes in academia and practice. © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.



Results:


                            Impact                            

                   Certainity                   

Health and Wellbeing

0.0189
Urban and Territorial Renovation 0.0290
Peoples Engagement and Participation 0.9848
Note: Due to lack of computing power, results have been previously created and saved in database