FIND IMPACT FOR ARTICLE

Analyze article and determine social impact





Id : 695

Author :
Bermingham A., ORourke J., Gurrin C., Collins R., Irving K., Smeaton A.F.

Title


Automatically recommending multimedia content for use in group reminiscence therap

Reference :


Bermingham A., ORourke J., Gurrin C., Collins R., Irving K., Smeaton A.F.; Automatically recommending multimedia content for use in group reminiscence therap ;MIIRH 2013 - Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Multimedia Indexing and Information Retrieval for Heathcare, Co-located with ACM Multimedia 2013 vol: issue: page:49.0

Link to article https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84887189046&doi=10.1145%2f2505323.2505333&partnerID=40&md5=82730de1f23525bb5a7f5a684ed97a3e
Abstract This paper presents and evaluates a novel approach for automatically recommending multimedia content for use in group reminiscence therapy for people with Alzheimers and other dementias. In recent years recommender systems have seen popularity in providing a personalised experience in information discovery tasks. This personalisation approach is naturally suited to tasks in healthcare, such as reminiscence therapy, where there has been a trend towards an increased emphasis on person-centred care. Building on recent work which has shown benefits to reminiscence therapy in a group setting, we develop and evaluate a system, REMPAD, which profiles people with Alzheimers and other dementias, and provides multimedia content tailored to a given group context. In this paper we present our system and approach, and report on a user trial in residential care settings. In our evaluation we examine the potential to use early-aggregation and late-aggregation of group member preferences using case-based reasoning combined with a content-based method. We evaluate with respect to accuracy, utility and perceived usefulness. The results overall are positive and we find that our best-performing approach uses early aggregation CBR combined with a content-based method. Also, under different evaluation criteria, we note different performances, with certain configurations of our approach providing better accuracy and others providing better utility. © 2013 ACM.



Results:


                            Impact                            

                   Certainity                   

Health_and_Wellbeing

0.9974
Urban_and_Territorial_Renovation 0.0021
Peoples_Engagement_and_Participation 0.0022
Note: Due to lack of computing power, results have been previously created and saved in database