ARTICLE KNOWLEDGE GRAPH

Analysis of interlinked descriptions of entities - objects, events, situations or abstract concepts – while also encoding the semantics





Id 119
Author McCarthy, K., F.; Ondaatje, E., H.; Zakaras, L., ; Brooks, A.,
Title Gifts of the muse: Reframing the debate about the benefits of the arts.
Reference

McCarthy, K. F., Ondaatje, E. H., Zakaras, L., y Brooks, A. (2004). Gifts of the muse: Reframing the debate about the benefits of the arts. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

Keywords Benefits; Arts; Empirical research
Link to article https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2005/RAND_MG218.pdf
Abstract Understanding the benefits of the arts is central to the discussion and design of policies affecting the arts. This study addresses the widely perceived need to articulate the private and public benefits of involvement in the arts. The findings are intended to engage the arts community and the public in a new dialogue about the value of the arts, to stimulate further research, and to help public and private policymakers reach informed decisions.

Metodology The basis of this study was an extensive review of published sources of several kinds. First, authors reviewed the evidence for the instrumental benefits of the arts. Second, they reviewed conceptual theories from multiple disciplines they thought might provide insights about how such effects are generated, a subject largely ignored by empirical studies of the arts’ instrumental benefits. Third, authors reviewed the literature on the intrinsic effects of the arts, including works of aesthetics, philosophy, and art criticism. And finally, they reviewed the literature on participation in the arts to identify factors that give individuals access to the arts and the benefits they provide.

Technique Literature review


knowledge graph

Note: Due to lack of computing power, results have been previously created and saved in database