RESEARCH METHODS

Analysis of article to determine research methods used






Id : 2142

Author :
Certomà C.; Giaccaria P.

Title


Dialogic practices of urban gardening in Rome: “Reading for difference” in social innovation

Reference :


Certomà C.; Giaccaria P. Dialogic practices of urban gardening in Rome: “Reading for difference” in social innovation,Urban Geography

Link to article https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85147443433&doi=10.1080%2f02723638.2023.2169487&partnerID=40&md5=905cdbea858708d6635b32809721d634
Abstract The paper contributes to the debate on the polyvocal nature of social innovation via the exploration of one of its principal manifestations: urban gardening. Initially, we wonder whether the dualistic reading of urban gardening, as a neoliberal vs revolutionary political initiative, is appropriate and productive, or rather, we should recognize its intrinsic ambiguity and boundary-blurring nature as able to produce novelty. Following Gibson-Graham’s intuition that escaping dichotomies can produce creative socio-political alternatives, we explore the gray area where confrontational stances turn into dialogical practices. We dig deep into the character and agency of three exemplary urban gardening initiatives in Rome, included in the network of Zappata Romana. Our telling shows the inadequacy of a binary reading and sheds light on whether and under what conditions the polyvocal–and contradictory–nature of urban gardening, and social innovation, in general, represents a generative terrain for socially emancipatory and creative practices. © 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Results:


Metodology:

None detected


Note: Due to lack of computing power, results have been previously created and saved in database