2021 © CD
Analysis of article to determine research methods used
| Id : | 2893 | |
Author : | Ball J.E. | |
Title | Modelling accuracy for urban design flood estimation |
|
| Reference : | Ball J.E. Modelling accuracy for urban design flood estimation,Urban Water Journal 19 1 |
|
| Link to article | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85111692067&doi=10.1080%2f1573062X.2021.1955283&partnerID=40&md5=f322a262ac9d53d48a65940461e5eaca |
|
| Abstract | Management of flood risk remains a major problem in many urban environments. To generate the data needed for estimation of the flood risk, catchment models have been used with the reliability of the predicted catchment response for design flood estimation dependent upon the model calibration. However, the level of calibration required to achieve reliable design flood estimation remains unspecified. The purpose of this paper is to assess the event modelling accuracy needed if data from the calibrated model are to be used for continuous simulation of data for flood frequency analysis. For this purpose, a SWMM-based catchment model was investigated using 25 monitored events, while the assessment of the calibration was based on a normalised peak flow error. Alternative sets of parameter values were used to obtain estimates of the peak flow for each of the selected events. The best performing sets of these sets of parameter values were used with SWMM in a continuous simulation mode to predict flow sequences for extraction of Annual Maxima Series for an At-Site Flood Frequency Analysis. From the analysis of these At-Site Flood Frequency Analyses, it was concluded that the normalised peak flow error needed to be less than 10% if reliable design flood quantile estimates were to be obtained. © 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. |
|
2021 © CD