| Id | 2029 | |
| Author | Marsh R.; Pilkington P.; Marco E.; Rice L. | |
| Title | Evaluating a workforce development programme: bringing public health into architecture education in England | |
| Reference | Marsh R.; Pilkington P.; Marco E.; Rice L. Evaluating a workforce development programme: bringing public health into architecture education in England,Cities and Health 6 2 |
|
| Link to article | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85135797050&doi=10.1080%2f23748834.2020.1736738&partnerID=40&md5=3252d1ae2f573eab2648fe133110b4ad |
|
| Abstract | Architects can play a key role in the wider public health workforce, in ensuring building and urban design is health promoting. However, there is no requirement to teach health by architectural accreditation bodies across Europe. To evaluate the long-term individual and organisational impacts of the Public Health Practitioner in Residence (PHPiR) programme–an educational initiative in a British university to help realise the architecture profession’s potential to contribute to improved population health. A longitudinal mixed-methods evaluation using the RE-AIM framework. Data were collected using questionnaires, a focus group, interviews, and programme documentation from a Bachelor of Architecture cohort and stakeholders from 2011 to 2019. Participants developed a broad understanding of the determinants of health, which was maintained when qualified architects. The programme became integrated into the university curriculum. Numerous facilitators and barriers affected the participants’ ability to create healthier buildings in practice. The positive results from this evaluation suggest that there is value in exploring how the PHPiR approach could be replicated in architecture courses within other higher education institutions. Findings highlight barriers in practice to be addressed in the future to help enable architects to create healthier buildings and places. © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. |
|
Results:
Smaller Distance better similarity
| Id | View | Author | Title | Distance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2810 |  |
Brunelli L.; Smith H.; Woolrych R. | A salutogenic urban design framework: the case of UK local high streets and older people | 102.566 |
| 2826 | |
Cooney S.; Raghavan B. | Opening the Gate to Urban Repair: A Tool for Citizen-Led Design | 128.541 |
| 2764 | |
Seyedashraf O.; Bottacin-Busolin A.; Harou J.J. | A design framework for considering spatial equity in sustainable urban drainage infrastructure | 131.459 |
| 2722 | |
Ziafati Bafarasat A.; Cheshmehzangi A.; Ankowska A. | A set of 99 healthy city indicators for application in urban planning and design | 134.417 |
| 2992 | |
Ataman C.; Tuncer B. | Urban Interventions and Participation Tools in Urban Design Processes: A Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis (1995 – 2021) | 134.494 |
| 2892 | |
Boldina A.; Gomes B.; Steemers K. | Active urbanism: The potential effect of urban design on bone health | 138.292 |
| 3033 | |
Eizenberg E.; Jabareen Y.; Arviv T.; Arussy D. | Urban space of recognition: design for ethno-cultural diversity in the German Colony, Haifa | 139.863 |
| 2982 | |
Araabi H.F. | Commentary: beauty in urban design - oppression or emancipation? | 141.198 |
| 3004 | |
Pineo H. | Towards healthy urbanism: inclusive, equitable and sustainable (THRIVES)–an urban design and planning framework from theory to praxis | 141.976 |
| 2795 | |
Afacan Y. | Impacts of urban living lab (ULL) on learning to design inclusive, sustainable, and climate-resilient urban environments | 143.151 |
MESOC has received funding
from Horizon 2020 - the EU Framework Programme
for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) -
under Grant Agreement n°870935.
We take your privacy seriously and WE DO NOT process any personal data or any information that reveals personal identity or information that can be linked to such information to identify directly or indirectly.
2021 © CD