| Id | 2114 | |
| Author | Vosburgh D.J.H.; Cauda E.; O’Shaughnessy P.T.; Sheehan M.J.; Park J.H.; Anderson K. | |
| Title | Direct-reading instruments for aerosols: A review for occupational health and safety professionals part 1: Instruments and good practices | |
| Reference | Vosburgh D.J.H.; Cauda E.; O’Shaughnessy P.T.; Sheehan M.J.; Park J.H.; Anderson K. Direct-reading instruments for aerosols: A review for occupational health and safety professionals part 1: Instruments and good practices,Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 19 12 |
|
| Link to article | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85140389069&doi=10.1080%2f15459624.2022.2132255&partnerID=40&md5=3968cd1be67f1ec4416d63574b14ca73 |
|
| Abstract | With advances in technology, there are an increasing number of direct-reading instruments available to occupational health and safety professionals to evaluate occupational aerosol exposures. Despite the wide array of direct-reading instruments available to professionals, the adoption of direct-reading technology to monitor workplace exposures has been limited, partly due to a lack of knowledge on how the instruments operate, how to select an appropriate instrument, and challenges in data analysis techniques. This paper presents a review of direct-reading aerosol instruments available to occupational health and safety professionals, describes the principles of operation, guides instrument selection based on the workplace and exposure, and discusses data analysis techniques to overcome these barriers to adoption. This paper does not cover all direct-reading instruments for aerosols but only those that an occupational health and safety professional could use in a workplace to evaluate exposures. Therefore, this paper focuses on instruments that have the most potential for workplace use due to their robustness, past workplace use, and price with regard to return on investment. The instruments covered in this paper include those that measure aerosol number concentration, mass concentration, and aerosol size distributions. © 2022 JOEH, LLC. |
|
Results:
Smaller Distance better similarity
| Id | View | Author | Title | Distance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2117 |  |
Sheehan M.J.; Vosburgh D.J.H.; O’Shaughnessy P.T.; Park J.H.; Sotelo C. | Direct-reading instruments for aerosols: A review for occupational health and safety professionals part 2: Applications | 68.5758 |
| 2836 | |
Xu L.; Zhang Y.; Li F.; Yin J. | Perceptual difference of urban public spaces between design professionals and ‘laypersons’: Evidence, health implications and ready-made urban design templates | 117.926 |
| 2951 | |
Mirzabeigi S.; Razkenari M. | Design optimization of urban typologies: A framework for evaluating building energy performance and outdoor thermal comfort | 122.432 |
| 3036 | |
Pineda A.F.V. | DISABILITIES, THE DESIGN OF URBAN TRANSPORT SYSTEMS AND THE CITY: A Situational Analysis | 125.216 |
| 2371 | |
Antonio M.G.; Williamson A.; Kameswaran V.; Beals A.; Ankrah E.; Goulet S.; Wang Y.; Macias G.; James-Gist J.; Brown L.K.; Davis S.; Pillai S.; Buis L.; Dillahunt T.; Veinot T.C. | Targeting Patients’ Cognitive Load for Telehealth Video Visits through Student-Delivered Helping Sessions at a United States Federally Qualified Health Center: Equity-Focused, Mixed Methods Pilot Intervention Study | 128.715 |
| 2978 | |
Ataman C.; Herthogs P.; Tunger B.; Perrault S. | Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Digital Participation: A framework to evaluate participation in urban design processes | 128.826 |
| 2999 | |
Bösehans G.; Walker I. | My sustainable city — Exploring lay people’s conception of sustainable urban design | 130.007 |
| 2967 | |
Katsavounidou G. | Distance Teaching Urban Design and Planning Studio Courses during the Pandemic: Challenges and Lessons Learnt | 131.851 |
| 2166 | |
Sektani H.H.J.; Khayat M.; Mohammadi M.; Roders A.P. | Factors Linking Perceptions of Built Heritage Conservation and Subjective Wellbeing | 133.383 |
| 2996 | |
Jia Z. | Garden Landscape Design Method in Public Health Urban Planning Based on Big Data Analysis Technology | 133.951 |
MESOC has received funding
from Horizon 2020 - the EU Framework Programme
for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) -
under Grant Agreement n°870935.
We take your privacy seriously and WE DO NOT process any personal data or any information that reveals personal identity or information that can be linked to such information to identify directly or indirectly.
2021 © CD