FIND SIMILAR ARTICLES

Find similar articles based on semantic search




Id 215
Author Huffer, I.,
Title Social inclusivity, cultural diversity and online film consumption
Reference

Huffer, I. (2017) Social inclusivity, cultural diversity and online film consumption, Cultural Trends, 26:2, 138-154, DOI: 10.1080/09548963.2017.1323844

Link to article https://doi-org.sire.ub.edu/10.1080/09548963.2017.1323844
Abstract It has been argued that the circulation of film online is a “democratising process”, evident in the breadth and depth of international film now available online, and in the greater ease of access to this content for audiences across the world. This is seen by some to present greater commercial opportunities for film-making from countries marginalised by previous distribution networks, and to foster a more globally diverse and inclusive film-viewing culture, with particular benefits for diasporic populations. Others, however, have pointed to the way in which audiences’ engagement with film online may be constrained by the economics and technology of online distribution and cultural competencies rooted in social stratification. These factors may limit how and what audiences watch, extending beyond issues of physical access to those of cultural access. As such, they raise questions regarding the demographic composition of the audience for online methods of film distribution and different types of international film. We lack sufficient understanding of these issues, however, due to the limited emphasis upon socio-demographic variables in existing academic research into online film consumption, and the limited consideration of particular film content in relevant market research. This article uses original audience research to interrogate the extent to which online distribution is able to connect audiences to a diversity of international film in comparison to other methods of distribution. It also considers some of the socio-demographic characteristics of the audiences for different methods of distribution and types of international film. In doing so, the article grants us a clearer understanding of the degree to which online film distribution fosters diversity and inclusivity through the connections it facilitates between audiences and content.


Results:


Smaller Distance better similarity

Id View Author Title Distance
792 View Picone I., Courtois C., Paulussen S. When news is everywhere: Understanding participation, cross-mediality and mobility in journalism from a radical user perspective 107.097
800 View Walwema J. Digital notebooks: Composing with open access 122.539
793 View Peters C., Witschge T. From grand narratives of democracy to small expectations of participation: Audiences, citizenship, and interactive tools in digital journalism 123.481
898 View Ryan H.E., Flinders M. From senseless to sensory democracy: Insights from applied and participatory theatre 124.251
784 View Blackwell A. Tweeting from the grave: Shakespeare, adaptation, and social media 124.631
630 View Paschild C. Community archives and the limitations of identity: Considering discursive impact on material needs 131.98
900 View Staniškyte J. Spectatorship, politics and the rules of participation: Re-discovering the audience in contemporary Lithuanian theatre 133.211
790 View Engelke K.M. Online participatory journalism: A systematic literature review 133.385
195 View Richards, I., Archives as a cornerstone of community growth: developing community archives in Brandon, Manitoba. 133.432
681 View Japzon A., Agosto D.E. Exploration of the motivation for and knowledge of preservation practices for personal digital artifacts 134.063
Note: Due to lack of computing power, results have been previously created and saved in database