FIND SIMILAR ARTICLES

Find similar articles based on semantic search




Id 2187
Author Gustafsson C.; Ripp M.
Title A metamodel for heritage-based urban recovery
Reference

Gustafsson C.; Ripp M. A metamodel for heritage-based urban recovery,Built Heritage 6 1

Link to article https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85144289090&doi=10.1186%2fs43238-022-00068-8&partnerID=40&md5=107e50ac6a6b0784ef8e6aeb809773be
Abstract Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to discuss the potential transfer of a metamodel for heritage-based urban development (HBUD) in a postcrisis urban recovery scenario. Design/methodology/approach: After an introduction to the field of cultural heritage as a resource for urban development, the research question is elaborated, and the current understanding of urban heritage is explored. The use of the metamodel in a postcrisis urban recovery setting is described as a potential solution. The proposed metamodel is introduced along with the grounded theory and design research methodology through which it was developed. The specific qualities of metamodels and how they can contribute to the proposed use are highlighted. The scenario is then developed further, and specific ways in which the metamodel could contribute are elaborated. Finally, the metamodel is compared to other methods, such as the historic urban landscape (HUL) approach, and the limitations are discussed. Findings: The metamodel can potentially be used in a postcrisis urban recovery scenario. The metamodel cannot be used directly, owing to the nature of metamodels; however, it can be transferred to a specific context and help to structure successful heritage-based urban recovery (HBUR) processes. Practical limitations/implications: One limitation is that it can be difficult to understand the differences between models and metamodels. Only with a comprehensive understanding of the nature of metamodels can this metamodel be applied, for example, to select appropriate models for HBUR. The metamodel can help to ensure that all relevant ‘elements’ are part of the processes designed for HBUR and emphasise the need for thorough planning, or scoping, of such processes. Originality/value: Metamodelling has not previously been used for HBUD or HBUR. © 2022, The Author(s).


Results:


Smaller Distance better similarity

Id View Author Title Distance
2693 View Salamagy H.B.; Alves F.B.; do Vale C.P. Urban Design Solutions for the Environmental Requalification of Informal Neighbourhoods: The George Dimitrov Neighbourhood, Maputo 79.8463
3005 View Knutz E.; Dankl K. Urban experiments exhibited: Exploring practice-based design research and agency in urban space 94.9563
2193 View Guidetti E.; Ferrara M. Embodied energy in existing buildings as a tool for sustainable intervention on urban heritage 96.0628
3033 View Eizenberg E.; Jabareen Y.; Arviv T.; Arussy D. Urban space of recognition: design for ethno-cultural diversity in the German Colony, Haifa 100.643
2773 View De Jorge-Huertas V.; De Jorge-Moreno J. MAPPING URBAN DESIGN LITERATURE: A NETWORK-BASED APPROACH 101.798
2953 View Semeraro T.; Scarano A.; Pandey R. Ecosystem Services Analysis and Design through Nature-Based Solutions in Urban Planning at a Neighbourhood Scale 101.821
2904 View Jóźwik R.; Jóźwik A. Influence of environmental factors on urban and architectural design—Example of a former paper mill in nanterre 103.942
2762 View Chapa F.; Perez Rubi M.; Hack J. A Systematic Assessment for the Co-Design of Green Infrastructure Prototypes—A Case Study in Urban Costa Rica 107.974
2211 View Arbab P.; Alborzi G. Toward developing a sustainable regeneration framework for urban industrial heritage 108.134
2510 View Muehlhaus S.L.; Eghtebas C.; Seifert N.; Schubert G.; Petzold F.; Klinker G. Game.UP: Gamified Urban Planning Participation Enhancing Exploration, Motivation, and Interactions 109.261
Note: Due to lack of computing power, results have been previously created and saved in database