| Id | 219 | |
| Author | Rahbarianyazd, R., ; Doratli, N., | |
| Title | Assessing the contribution of cultural agglomeration in urban regeneration through developing cultural strategies. | |
| Reference | Rahbarianyazd, R., Doratli, N. (2017). Assessing the contribution of cultural agglomeration in urban regeneration through developing cultural strategies. European Planning Studies, 25(10): 1714‑1733. |
|
| Link to article | https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1317721 |
|
| Abstract | The recent discussion regarding contemporary urban regeneration has underlined the increasing role of art and cultural agglomeration as an essential part of a progressive agenda for local development. In fact, there is a good deal of literature which is related to specific and finite cultural strategies. Although scholars, in some cases, may suggest other perspectives, their value narrows to a comprehensive evaluation regarding the possible interpretation of cultural agglomeration in respect of urban regeneration. Accordingly, this study, by using an interdisciplinary systemic approach based on the clustering of cultural carriers, developed the cultural strategies under a six concepts scheme. The study then, through developing a method based on modes and development approach of cultural agglomeration, recategorized the six mentioned strategies into three major categories of cultural strategies, to find out their contribution in the process of urban regeneration. Overall, the study revealed the extent of cultural agglomeration as a method of developing cultural strategies in urban regeneration. |
|
Results:
Smaller Distance better similarity
| Id | View | Author | Title | Distance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 107 |  |
Evans, G., | Measure for measure: evaluating the evidence of culture’s contribution to regeneration. | 65.2838 |
| 201 | |
Stern, M., J.; Seifert, S., C. | Cultural Clusters: The Implications of Cultural Assets Agglomeration for Neighborhood Revitalization | 71.0246 |
| 136 | |
Evans, G., ; Shaw , P., | The contribution of culture to regeneration in the UK: a review of evidence | 82.521 |
| 150 | |
Markusen , A., ; Godwa, A., | Arts and Culture in Urban or Regional Planning: A Review and Research Agenda | 84.1745 |
| 154 | |
Galloway, S., | Theory-based evaluation and the social impact of the arts | 85.1456 |
| 676 | |
Evans G. | Participation and provision in arts & culture – bridging the divide | 87.2401 |
| 112 | |
Laaksonen, A., | Measuring Cultural Exclusion through Participation in Cultural Life. | 88.7639 |
| 507 | |
Robazza P., Longo D., Bortoli G., Alese G., Boeri A. | DIY urbanism as a tool of urban regeneration. Two cases in comparison | 90.4613 |
| 169 | |
Windle, G.; Gregory, S.; Howson-Griffiths, T.; Newman, A.; O Brien, D.; Gouldin, A. | Exploring the theoretical foundations of visual art programmes for people living with dementia | 90.5768 |
| 198 | |
Crossick, G., | The Social Impact of Cultural Districts | 90.8488 |
MESOC has received funding
from Horizon 2020 - the EU Framework Programme
for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) -
under Grant Agreement n°870935.
We take your privacy seriously and WE DO NOT process any personal data or any information that reveals personal identity or information that can be linked to such information to identify directly or indirectly.
2021 © CD