| Id | 2212 | |
| Author | Jonsson A.-P.; Haas T. | |
| Title | New urban developments in a heritage area. A case study of Skeppsholmsviken 6 in Stockholm, Sweden | |
| Reference | Jonsson A.-P.; Haas T. New urban developments in a heritage area. A case study of Skeppsholmsviken 6 in Stockholm, Sweden,A Research Agenda for Urban Tourism |
|
| Link to article | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85130113606&partnerID=40&md5=859a27763fe5b65da34a39a66973fc41 |
|
| Abstract | A vibrant visitor industry can be a useful indicator of good urban environments. People choose to visit a destination because there is something to see there; there is something worth experiencing. It is well-known that heritage spaces score high on lists of what people enjoy and look for when travelling. Stockholm is no different from other cities in this regard. Some of the most visited destinations in the capital include Gamla Stan (the Old Town) and Djurg√•rden (the Royal National City Park). Both places are the result of hundreds of years of history, careful development and many generations of residents placing their “footprints” on the social milieu of the place; such places cannot easily be replaced or “fast-tracked” into being. In other words, there is an imperative to manage new urban developments in such places carefully, especially since they are often the site of conflicting interests. To better understand the challenges this imperative might place on planning practices, this case study follows the planning process of a plot located on Djurg√•rden in Stockholm. The case study will observe that conflicting interests and values between residents, urban heritage professionals and private corporate actors - with regards to how such a plot should be allowed to develop - highlight the complicated nature of planning in heritage areas. © Jan van der Borg 2022. |
|
Results:
Smaller Distance better similarity
| Id | View | Author | Title | Distance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2650 |  |
Chang J.-J.; Chen R.-F.; Lin C.-L. | Exploring the Driving Factors of Urban Music Festival Tourism and Service Development Strategies Using the Modified SIA-NRM Approach | 144.471 |
| 2181 | |
Li J.; Dai T.; Yin S.; Zhao Y.; Ikiz Kaya D.; Yang L. | Promoting conservation or change? The UNESCO label of world heritage (re)shaping urban morphology in the Old Town of Lijiang, China | 146.881 |
| 2203 | |
Kádár B.; Klaniczay J. | Branding Built Heritage through Cultural Urban Festivals: An Instagram Analysis Related to Sustainable Co-Creation, in Budapest | 150.074 |
| 2168 | |
Hmood K.F. | CONSERVATION OF URBAN HERITAGE IN HISTORICAL CENTRES OF CONTEMPORARY CITIES | 150.134 |
| 2219 | |
Kiperman F. | Registers of transience: Heritage and urban change | 154.366 |
| 2235 | |
Sung M. | Influences of Rural Heritage on Resident Participation in Community Activities: A Case Study of the Villages of Jeoji-ri and Handong-ri on Jeju Island, South Korea | 155.191 |
| 3001 | |
He M.; Wang Y.; Wang W.J.; Xie Z. | Therapeutic plant landscape design of urban forest parks based on the Five Senses Theory: A case study of Stanley Park in Canada | 159.216 |
| 2161 | |
Gallou E. | Heritage and pathways to wellbeing: From personal to social benefits, between experience identity and capability shaping | 162.619 |
| 2969 | |
Schmidt L.M.; Hansen H.K. | The role of non-local external resources and less-urban location in design processes–A study of the Danish fashion industry | 165.122 |
| 2180 | |
Leão M.T.G.; Brandão F.A. | Universities’ built heritage as a means to diversify urban tourist destinations’ cultural supply: the case of the University of Porto | 166.489 |
MESOC has received funding
from Horizon 2020 - the EU Framework Programme
for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) -
under Grant Agreement n°870935.
We take your privacy seriously and WE DO NOT process any personal data or any information that reveals personal identity or information that can be linked to such information to identify directly or indirectly.
2021 © CD