Urban Design Solutions to Mitigate Seismic Risk at the Small Scale: Bazaar Area, Rasht
118.108
2208
Anelli D.; Tajani F.
Valorization of cultural heritage and land take reduction: an urban compensation model for the replacement of unsuitable buildings in an Italian UNESCO site
118.442
3029
Seo K.W.
FINE-GRAINED PARALLELISM FOR POST-PANDEMIC CITIES: 12 DESIGN STRATEGIES FOR RESILIENT URBAN PLANNING
118.957
2141
Manfredo Manfredini M.
Affirmatively reading deterritorialisation in urban space: An Aotearoa/New Zealand perspective
119.675
2027
Boldina A.; Hanel P.H.P.; Steemers K.
Active Urbanism and choice architecture: Encouraging the use of challenging city routes for health and fitness
121.535
2171
Liu Y.; Jin X.; Dupre K.
Engaging stakeholders in contested urban heritage planning and management
122.502
2879
Cremen G.; Galasso C.; McCloskey J.; Barcena A.; Creed M.; Filippi M.E.; Gentile R.; Jenkins L.T.; Kalaycioglu M.; Mentese E.Y.; Muthusamy M.; Tarbali K.; Trogrlić R.Š.
A state-of-the-art decision-support environment for risk-sensitive and pro-poor urban planning and design in Tomorrow's cities
125.749
2190
Cermeño H.; Mielke K.
Endangered Urban Commons: Lahore’s Violent Heritage Management and Prospects for Reconciliation
127.147
3053
Custers L.; Huybrechts L.; Devisch O.
A matter of scales: Experiential evaluation as a scaling device to support a scaling platform in a case of urban design
130.245
2044
Vardopoulos I.
Industrial building adaptive reuse for museum. Factors affecting visitors’ perceptions of the sustainable urban development potential
131.474
Note: Due to lack of computing power, results have been previously created and saved in database
MESOC has received funding
from Horizon 2020 - the EU Framework Programme
for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) -
under Grant Agreement n°870935.
We take your privacy seriously and WE DO NOT process any personal data or any information that reveals personal identity or information that can be linked to such information to identify directly or indirectly.