FIND SIMILAR ARTICLES

Find similar articles based on semantic search




Id 507
Author Robazza P., Longo D., Bortoli G., Alese G., Boeri A.
Title DIY urbanism as a tool of urban regeneration. Two cases in comparison
Reference

Robazza P., Longo D., Bortoli G., Alese G., Boeri A.; DIY urbanism as a tool of urban regeneration. Two cases in comparison ;International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning vol:15.0 issue: 3 page:261.0

Link to article https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85085256194&doi=10.18280%2fijsdp.150301&partnerID=40&md5=a555eadc2b94e8c20e3e007b8702ed49
Abstract A process of urban regeneration should be able to produce social and spatial contextual effects. In order to achieve long-term results, it has to guarantee social inclusion. New rising ways of transformation of public space, consisting in the urban co-design, are defining new tools able to trigger processes of regeneration so called “community-led”. One of the approaches used by different groups of architects to trigger regeneration processes of so-called “in need areas” is the activation of the community through urban laboratories of social innovation for the realization of temporary transformations of space. This article explores the analysis of DIY (Do It Yourself) Urbanism tools of co-planning and co-construction as motors of innovation, activation and social inclusion, investigating their role in urban regeneration. Questions are being asked about the new skills of the architect involved in these procedures and about possible tools useful to the institutions to act in these operative fields. The purpose is to analyze some practices, hypothesizing their replicability and applicability to different scales, in order to generate virtuous mechanisms. Two experiences of co-design and co-construction, located in two different geographic, social and political contexts, will be shown: the construction of the Casa de la lluvia (de ideas), in Bogotà(Colombia), and the regeneration of Piazza Gasparotto, in Padua (Italy). Despite the peculiarities of context, we want to illustrate the strategies implemented in the cases exposed, in order to identify shared features and differences due to the degrees of freedom that the participation tools must have, to be flexible and repeatable. © 2020 WITPress. All rights reserved.


Results:


Smaller Distance better similarity

Id View Author Title Distance
746 View Onesti A. Built environment, creativity, social art: The recovery of public space as engine of human development 81.9513
637 View Cerreta M., Daldanise G., Sposito S. Culture-led regeneration for urban spaces Monitoring complex values networks in action 82.9875
219 View Rahbarianyazd, R., ; Doratli, N., Assessing the contribution of cultural agglomeration in urban regeneration through developing cultural strategies. 90.4613
525 View Urbanowicz K., Nyka L. Interactive and Media Architecture - From Social Encounters to City Planning Strategies 91.4478
530 View Afacan Y., Afacan S.O. Rethinking social inclusivity: Design strategies for cities 91.9914
107 View Evans, G., Measure for measure: evaluating the evidence of culture’s contribution to regeneration. 95.2438
520 View Kochergina E. Urban Planning Aspects of Museum Quarters as an Architectural Medium for Creative Cities 96.7693
864 View Bonev I., Shimura S., Fricke H.H., Tsukamoto Y. Design and construction methodology for de-institutional architecture: A case study on “Lakeside Dancers Club” at Horst Festival 96.8943
513 View Serrano-Jiménez A., Lima M.L., Molina-Huelva M., Barrios-Padura Á. Promoting urban regeneration and aging in place: APRAM – An interdisciplinary method to support decision-making in building renovation 100.007
802 View Bridger A.J., Emmanouil S., Lawthom R. Trace.space: a psychogeographical community project with members of an arts and health organisation 103.484
Note: Due to lack of computing power, results have been previously created and saved in database