| Id | 512 | |
| Author | Horgan D., Dimitrijević B. | |
| Title | Frameworks for citizens participation in planning: From conversational to smart tools | |
| Reference | Horgan D., Dimitrijević B.; Frameworks for citizens participation in planning: From conversational to smart tools ;Sustainable Cities and Society vol:48.0 issue: page: |
|
| Link to article | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85064929200&doi=10.1016%2fj.scs.2019.101550&partnerID=40&md5=9dca2fcbe52fa4ca9cf1feb8dec1a7d5 |
|
| Abstract | The paper concentrates on tools and technologies used for participatory processes in sustainable urban planning. Scotlands Place Standard, BREEAM-Communities assessment tool and the Smart City technologies for co-production in urban planning and design are analysed through literature review. Aktivniy Grazhdanin, a citizen engagement portal, established to devolve decision-making on aspects of Moscows urban planning to citizens, provides a case study on the potential use of online tools to solicit citizens’ views on the city management and transformation. Tools were selected as they provide participatory frameworks for developing consensus among decision makers and stakeholders on planning strategy, but use different methods - Scotlands Place Standard initiates a dialogue with interested groups; BREEAM-Communities includes a consultation with stakeholders at a later stage; and Aktivniy Grazhdanin attempts to solicit stakeholders’ views by using online tools. Comprehensive criticism in the research of Kitchin (2014) and Angelidou and Psaltoglou (2017) identified themes around ownership, governance and participation that informed the line of questioning in the case study. The research highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the analysed tools. It recommends how frameworks can be best shaped by such tools to achieve local ownership and provide structure for a more inclusive urban planning. © 2019 |
|
Results:
Smaller Distance better similarity
| Id | View | Author | Title | Distance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 789 |  |
Mihailidis P., Gamwell A. | Designing Engagement in Local News: Using FOIA Requests to Create Inclusive Participatory Journalism Practices | 100.482 |
| 147 | |
Gallou, E., ; Fouseki, K., | Applying Social Impact Assessment (SIA) Principles in Assessing Contribution of Cultural Heritage to Social Sustainability. | 105.034 |
| 864 | |
Bonev I., Shimura S., Fricke H.H., Tsukamoto Y. | Design and construction methodology for de-institutional architecture: A case study on “Lakeside Dancers Club” at Horst Festival | 105.837 |
| 802 | |
Bridger A.J., Emmanouil S., Lawthom R. | Trace.space: a psychogeographical community project with members of an arts and health organisation | 109.596 |
| 525 | |
Urbanowicz K., Nyka L. | Interactive and Media Architecture - From Social Encounters to City Planning Strategies | 111.437 |
| 207 | |
Cortés-Rico, L., ; Piedrahita-Solórzano, G., | Participatory Design in Practice. The Case of an Embroidered Technology. | 111.57 |
| 149 | |
Jones, A., L. | Regenerating Urban Waterfronts—Creating Better Futures—From Commercial and Leisure Market Places to Cultural Quarters and Innovation Districts. | 112.11 |
| 560 | |
Kelemen M., Hamilton L. | Creative processes of impact making: advancing an American Pragmatist Methodology | 115.243 |
| 890 | |
Stam V. | The possibilities and limits of participatory theatre: Exploring belonging and resistance with second-generation black and Muslim Dutch youth in the Netherlands | 115.499 |
| 916 | |
Macchia T., DAndrea V., Mazzini R., Di Fiore A., Cozza M. | Exploring theater of the oppressed for participatory design | 116.742 |
MESOC has received funding
from Horizon 2020 - the EU Framework Programme
for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) -
under Grant Agreement n°870935.
We take your privacy seriously and WE DO NOT process any personal data or any information that reveals personal identity or information that can be linked to such information to identify directly or indirectly.
2021 © CD