| Id | 641 | |
| Author | Carnegie A., Norris M. | |
| Title | Strengthening communities, building capacity, combating stigma: exploring the potential of culture-led social housing regeneration | |
| Reference | Carnegie A., Norris M.; Strengthening communities, building capacity, combating stigma: exploring the potential of culture-led social housing regeneration ;International Journal of Housing Policy vol:15 issue: 4.0 page:495.0 |
|
| Link to article | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84945435545&doi=10.1080%2f14616718.2015.1085216&partnerID=40&md5=438bb8e8d162d10630a045be37c070dc |
|
| Abstract | Culture-led regeneration has long been recognised as a mechanism of re-branding declining urban areas by providing cultural infrastructure, such as museums, galleries and theatres. Whilst often lauded for its potential to economically regenerate cities, the model has shown to have a less positive impact on marginalised households and neighbourhoods. This article explores the utilisation of culture-led regeneration in three disadvantaged Irish social housing estates and finds that it did generate benefits, but not the economic ones predicted by the main authors in this field. Rather its benefits were primarily social – it helped to combat stigmatisation, build local capacity and improve community cohesion. Levels of community participation in cultural activities were very strong in two of the case study neighbourhoods, but much weaker in the third less generously resourced neighbourhood, which raises questions about the levels of investment needed to ensure success and the long-term sustainability of these programmes. © 2015 Taylor & Francis. |
|
Results:
Smaller Distance better similarity
| Id | View | Author | Title | Distance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 640 |  |
Pastak I., Kährik A. | The impacts of culture-led flagship projects on local communities in the context of post-socialist tallinn | 81.034 |
| 107 | |
Evans, G., | Measure for measure: evaluating the evidence of culture’s contribution to regeneration. | 88.4624 |
| 646 | |
Ozden P. | Culture-led regeneration projects in post-industrial areas: The Istanbul experience | 102.036 |
| 713 | |
Fancourt D., Steptoe A. | Cultural engagement predicts changes in cognitive function in older adults over a 10 year period: Findings from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing | 102.742 |
| 643 | |
Comunian R., Mould O. | The weakest link: Creative industries, flagship cultural projects and regeneration | 105.211 |
| 912 | |
Byrne E., Elliott E., Williams G. | Performing the micro-social: using theatre to debate research findings on everyday life, health and well-being | 105.324 |
| 633 | |
Martins J.C. | Tangible cultural heritage re-appropriation towards a new urban centrality. A critical crossroad in semi-peripheral eastern riverside lisbon | 105.599 |
| 218 | |
Navarro Yanez, C., J. | Do ‘creative cities’ have a dark side? Cultural scenes and socioeconomic status in Barcelona and Madrid (1991–2001) | 108.183 |
| 130 | |
Belfiore, E., ; Bennett, O., | Beyond the “Toolkit Approach”: Arts Impact Evaluation Research and the Realities of Cultural Policy‐Making | 109.61 |
| 104 | |
Kay, A., | Art and community development: The role the arts have in regenerating communities | 111.444 |
MESOC has received funding
from Horizon 2020 - the EU Framework Programme
for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) -
under Grant Agreement n°870935.
We take your privacy seriously and WE DO NOT process any personal data or any information that reveals personal identity or information that can be linked to such information to identify directly or indirectly.
2021 © CD