| Id | 751 | |
| Author | Fremaux S., Fremaux M. | |
| Title | Remembering the beatles legacy in hamburgs problematic tourism strategy | |
| Reference | Fremaux S., Fremaux M.; Remembering the beatles legacy in hamburgs problematic tourism strategy ;Journal of Heritage Tourism vol:8.0 issue: 4.0 page:303.0 |
|
| Link to article | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84943261705&doi=10.1080%2f1743873X.2013.799172&partnerID=40&md5=0132593e4f940bf634b2b155657e5849 |
|
| Abstract | Since the late 1980s/early 1990s, Liverpool has been synonymous with Beatles-related tourism, investing in museums, city walks, and redeveloping the Mathew Street Cavern Quarter. Another, perhaps lesser known, site of Beatles tourism that has slowly immerged in recent years is the Reeperbahn area of Hamburg, Germany. While a number of cities with a strong musical heritage have developed tourism and urban regeneration around their musical past, primary research and photographic evidence gathered in Hamburg reveals that Hamburg is a city of conflicting identities. The citys leaders want Hamburg to compete as a cultural and financial site of tourism and investment on a global scale. However, by examining the mytholization of ‘the Beatles’ Hamburg’ at the Beatlemania Museum, and the lack of investment in the surrounding infrastructure, research shows that this act of selective memory is driven by economic and ideological agendas in Hamburgs overall urban regeneration plans. Arguably, the multi-billion euro HafenCity project is to be the new vision and focus of Hamburgs regenerated image. This article does not argue for a ‘Disneyfication’ of Hamburgs Reeperbahn area, but attempts to highlight the missed opportunities for the city to support and cultivate its music heritage and struggling artisan/independent scene. © 2013 Taylor & Francis. |
|
Results:
Smaller Distance better similarity
| Id | View | Author | Title | Distance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 636 |  |
Liu Y.-D. | Event and sustainable culture-led regeneration: Lessons from the 2008 European Capital of Culture, Liverpool | 124.609 |
| 668 | |
Killick A. | Resisting the creative economy on Liverpools north shore: Art-based political communication in practice | 133.448 |
| 171 | |
García, B., ; Melville, R., ; Cox, T., | Creating an Impact: Liverpool’s Experience as European Capital of Culture | 144.258 |
| 669 | |
Brunow D. | Manchesters post-punk heritage: Mobilising and contesting transcultural memory in the context of urban regeneration | 147.123 |
| 643 | |
Comunian R., Mould O. | The weakest link: Creative industries, flagship cultural projects and regeneration | 160.413 |
| 640 | |
Pastak I., Kährik A. | The impacts of culture-led flagship projects on local communities in the context of post-socialist tallinn | 168.843 |
| 528 | |
Park J., Lee H., Yim S. | A case of preservation of the modern and regeneration of old downtown through civic participatory remodeling procedure: Experimentation in Gwangju, Korea | 172.975 |
| 880 | |
Quinlan E., Thomas R., Ahmed S., Fichtner P., McMullen L., Block J. | The aesthetic rationality of the popular expressive arts: Lifeworld communication among breast cancer survivors living with lymphedema | 173.218 |
| 887 | |
Yamamura T., Zhang T.X., Fujiki Y. | The social and cultural impact of tourism development on world heritage sites: A case of the Old Town of Lijiang, China, 2000-2004 | 173.498 |
| 107 | |
Evans, G., | Measure for measure: evaluating the evidence of culture’s contribution to regeneration. | 173.905 |
MESOC has received funding
from Horizon 2020 - the EU Framework Programme
for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) -
under Grant Agreement n°870935.
We take your privacy seriously and WE DO NOT process any personal data or any information that reveals personal identity or information that can be linked to such information to identify directly or indirectly.
2021 © CD