| Id | 784 | |
| Author | Blackwell A. | |
| Title | Tweeting from the grave: Shakespeare, adaptation, and social media | |
| Reference | Blackwell A.; Tweeting from the grave: Shakespeare, adaptation, and social media ;The Routledge Companion to Adaptation vol: issue: page:287.0 |
|
| Link to article | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85049937818&doi=10.4324%2f9781315690254&partnerID=40&md5=e8cb646f01dfa782ade2e67e3615365a |
|
| Abstract | In Spreadable Media Henry Jenkins, Sam Ford, and Joshua Green provide a revolutionary model of contemporary cultural practices, suggesting that older, top-down models of distribution are no longer viable. They argue that in contemporary culture “a mix of top-down and bottom-up forces determine how material is shared across and among cultures in far more participatory (and messier) ways” (2013: 1). Founded on the simultaneity of circulation and reception, the explosion of participatory media forms marks a shift in which the public are not “simply consumers of preconstructed messages” but are “shaping, sharing, reframing and remixing media content” (2). This quality (examined by Jenkins, Ford, and Green in a variety of ?”spreadable” media forms including film, television, advertising, and gaming) is, the authors argue, a key characteristic of contemporary culture, with the unique mode of public engagement that invites “reshaping the media landscape itself” (2). It is this potential, “both technical and cultural,” for audiences to share content according to their own purposes, which is the focus of this paper and its discussion of Shakespeare’s continuing adaptive legacy on social media and, in particular, on Twitter (3). © 2018 selection and editorial matter, Dennis Cutchins, Katja Krebs, Eckart Voigts; individual chapters, the contributors. |
|
Results:
Smaller Distance better similarity
| Id | View | Author | Title | Distance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 208 |  |
Badham, M., | Cultural Indicators: Tools for Community Engagement? | 97.4478 |
| 676 | |
Evans G. | Participation and provision in arts & culture – bridging the divide | 101.646 |
| 141 | |
Bonet, L., ; Négrier, E., | The Participatory Turn in Cultural Policy: Paradigms, Models, Contexts. | 103.873 |
| 792 | |
Picone I., Courtois C., Paulussen S. | When news is everywhere: Understanding participation, cross-mediality and mobility in journalism from a radical user perspective | 106.158 |
| 900 | |
Staniškyte J. | Spectatorship, politics and the rules of participation: Re-discovering the audience in contemporary Lithuanian theatre | 111.459 |
| 800 | |
Walwema J. | Digital notebooks: Composing with open access | 114.769 |
| 793 | |
Peters C., Witschge T. | From grand narratives of democracy to small expectations of participation: Audiences, citizenship, and interactive tools in digital journalism | 116.113 |
| 543 | |
Ferreri M. | Painted Bullet Holes and Broken Promises: Understanding and Challenging Municipal Dispossession in Londons Public Housing ‘Decanting’ | 119.56 |
| 530 | |
Afacan Y., Afacan S.O. | Rethinking social inclusivity: Design strategies for cities | 120.54 |
| 646 | |
Ozden P. | Culture-led regeneration projects in post-industrial areas: The Istanbul experience | 121.251 |
MESOC has received funding
from Horizon 2020 - the EU Framework Programme
for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) -
under Grant Agreement n°870935.
We take your privacy seriously and WE DO NOT process any personal data or any information that reveals personal identity or information that can be linked to such information to identify directly or indirectly.
2021 © CD