| Id | 870 | |
| Author | Ibrahim I. | |
| Title | Socio environmental impact in eco-architecture | |
| Reference | Ibrahim I.; Socio environmental impact in eco-architecture ;WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment vol:128.0 issue: page:185.0 |
|
| Link to article | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-78549243024&doi=10.2495%2fARC100161&partnerID=40&md5=dd79c8001a27bcf27e0bb20ee0b2c218 |
|
| Abstract | The interest of this paper is to focus on the social community and its built environment as an important part of creating ecological design, satisfying the communitys social culture needs and achieving eco-architecture. The social impact assessment (SIA) is an important indicator in the age of information, communication technologies and globalization that affects the future of architecture. The social environment is different to the natural environment because it reacts in anticipation of change, but can adapt in reasoned ways to changing circumstances if this is part of the planning process, and there is the opportunity to participate in designing our future. This paper addresses itself to that modified challenge to achieve eco architecture. Firstly it attempts to define and clarify the SIA as a framework for the comprehensive understanding of environmental experience, regarding its variables and how it could be different depending on social cultures. Secondly it applies this idea to architectural projects that have won prizes at the AGKA awards for sustainable projects in developing countries, adopting the concept of our need to preserve the balance of nature. We consider Masdar, the zero carbon city in the UAE, in our case study with attention being given to the important relationship between physical design and social behaviour regarding eco-architecture. © 2010 WIT Press. |
|
Results:
Smaller Distance better similarity
| Id | View | Author | Title | Distance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 147 |  |
Gallou, E., ; Fouseki, K., | Applying Social Impact Assessment (SIA) Principles in Assessing Contribution of Cultural Heritage to Social Sustainability. | 107.374 |
| 524 | |
Kosk K. | Social Participation in Residential Architecture as an Instrument for Transforming Both the Architecture and the People Who Participate in It | 107.539 |
| 149 | |
Jones, A., L. | Regenerating Urban Waterfronts—Creating Better Futures—From Commercial and Leisure Market Places to Cultural Quarters and Innovation Districts. | 108.657 |
| 868 | |
Cavalcanti A.R.C. | How does work shape informal cities? The critical design of cities and housing in brazilian slums | 108.942 |
| 219 | |
Rahbarianyazd, R., ; Doratli, N., | Assessing the contribution of cultural agglomeration in urban regeneration through developing cultural strategies. | 112.986 |
| 864 | |
Bonev I., Shimura S., Fricke H.H., Tsukamoto Y. | Design and construction methodology for de-institutional architecture: A case study on “Lakeside Dancers Club” at Horst Festival | 113.478 |
| 533 | |
Ramirez-Figueroa C., Beckett R. | Living with buildings, living with microbes: Probiosis and architecture | 115.546 |
| 154 | |
Galloway, S., | Theory-based evaluation and the social impact of the arts | 117.408 |
| 916 | |
Macchia T., DAndrea V., Mazzini R., Di Fiore A., Cozza M. | Exploring theater of the oppressed for participatory design | 118.634 |
| 911 | |
Chowdhury A., Maiti S.K., Bhattacharyya S. | How to communicate climate change ‘impact and solutions’ to vulnerable population of Indian Sundarbans? From theory to practice | 119.199 |
MESOC has received funding
from Horizon 2020 - the EU Framework Programme
for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) -
under Grant Agreement n°870935.
We take your privacy seriously and WE DO NOT process any personal data or any information that reveals personal identity or information that can be linked to such information to identify directly or indirectly.
2021 © CD