Generate summary for article using Artificial Intelligence tools
| Id | 213 | |
| Author | Bianchini, F., ; Tommarchi, E., ; Hansen, L., E. | |
| Title | Problematising the question of participation in Capitals of Culture | |
| Reference | Tommarchi, E., Hansen, L. E., & Bianchini, F. (2018). Problematising the question of participation in Capitals of Culture. Participations: Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 15(2), 154-169. |
|
| Link to article | https://participations.org/Volume%2015/Issue%202/10.pdf |
|
| Abstract | Participation is increasingly a common feature in both Capital and City of Culture (CoC) programmes such as European Capitals of Culture (ECoC) and UK Cities of Culture (UKCoC). Since the mid-1990s and in particular in the last decade, many ECoCs have been displaying an emphasis on audience development and cultural engagement, impacting both on the balance of their cultural programming and on the design of specific projects and events with the aim of engaging local communities. This development that seems to be putting participation at the centre of both ECoCs and UKCoCs, at least at rhetorical level, is the motivation behind this Themed Section of Participations. Why has it become increasingly important and how is participation understood and practiced in the different local versions of CoCs? And how can participation in CoCs be understood in the context of both a broad societal participatory turn and a narrower participatory turn in cultural policy and in the practices of cultural institutions? This Themed Section does not give a simple and conclusive answer to these questions, but it offers partial, case-based examples and can be seen as the first step towards a better understanding of why, how and to what extent CoCs are participatory. In this editorial introduction, we map the landscape in which the specific cases presented in the articles are positioned. We look at the emergence and development of the agenda of participation in mainly the ECoC scheme and we identify some of the challenges that future research needs to address. |
Problematising the question of participation in Capitals of Culture. pafos bid was also considered innovative as it aimed to offer cultural activities throughout the city and in rural areas: an example was travelling playground that aimed at engaging local children with cyprus and europes history selection panel of the european capital of culture. first of all it needs to be specified what is meant by participation and what the aim of a participatory strategy is. finally the link between discussions of participation and of ecoc legacy strategies is lacking despite the fact that both participation and legacy are key concepts in most ecoc programmes. in this context longitudinal studies on participation are particularly needed in order to assess whether the innovative experiences of participation undertaken by many ecocs are able to continue after the events that triggered them.
MESOC has received funding
from Horizon 2020 - the EU Framework Programme
for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) -
under Grant Agreement n°870935.
We take your privacy seriously and WE DO NOT process any personal data or any information that reveals personal identity or information that can be linked to such information to identify directly or indirectly.
2021 © CD