SUMMARY FOR ARTICLE

Generate summary for article using Artificial Intelligence tools



Id 538
Author Jewkes Y., Jordan M., Wright S., Bendelow G.
Title Designing ‘healthy’ prisons for women: Incorporating trauma-informed care and practice (TICP) into prison planning and design
Reference
Jewkes Y., Jordan M., Wright S., Bendelow G.; Designing ‘healthy’ prisons for women: Incorporating trauma-informed care and practice (TICP) into prison planning and design ;International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health vol:16.0 issue: 20 page:

Link to article https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85074235840&doi=10.3390%2fijerph16203818&partnerID=40&md5=9d7d2a9476aaa59d5ac1a8289039287c
Abstract There has been growing acknowledgment among scholars, prison staff and policy-makers that gender-informed thinking should feed into penal policy but must be implemented holistically if gains are to be made in reducing trauma, saving lives, ensuring emotional wellbeing and promoting desistance from crime. This means that not only healthcare services and psychology programmes must be sensitive to individuals’ trauma histories but that the architecture and design of prisons should also be sympathetic, facilitating and encouraging trauma-informed and trauma-sensitive practices within. This article problematises the Trauma-Informed Care and Practice (TICP) initiatives recently rolled out across the female prison estate, arguing that attempts to introduce trauma-sensitive services in establishments that are replete with hostile architecture, overt security paraphernalia, and dilapidated fixtures and fittings is futile. Using examples from healthcare and custodial settings, the article puts forward suggestions for prison commissioners, planners and architects which we believe will have novel implications for prison planning and penal practice in the UK and beyond. © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Results:


Summary:



Designing ‘healthy’ prisons for women: Incorporating trauma-informed care and practice TICP into prison planning and design. These factors can in turn create an intense and debilitating work environment for sta with reported burn-out and high levels of absenteeism and early departures from the profession who themselves might benefit from a more TICP-centred environment; for example data from the US has shown a % decrease in prisoner-on-sta violence following the implementation of a trauma-informed regime at Massachusetts Correctional Institution-Framlingham . Reception areas where prisoners are processed on admission into custody can be particularly damaging because the administrative demands of eciency tend tobe incompatible with the concerns of the individual prisoner who when she most needs it is given little opportunity to discuss the reality of the world she is entering or her fears concerning unresolved problems on the outside. For example: Does removal from particular areas of the prison isolate sources of trouble that triggered exacerbated or contributed to symptoms of trauma. Despite the recent introduction of some elements of TICP in existing prisons the governments commitment to short-term cost savings at the expense of long-term rehabilitation results in well-intentioned but woefully unambitious attempts to improve environments that were originally purposefully designed with a punitive and retributive aesthetic.


Note: Due to lack of computing power, results have been previously created and saved in database