ARTICLE ANALYSIS

Analysis of article using Artificial Intelligence tools





Id 2916
Author Pineda-Pinto M.; Frantzeskaki N.; Chandrabose M.; Herreros-Cantis P.; McPhearson T.; Nygaard C.A.; Raymond C.
Title Planning Ecologically Just Cities: A Framework to Assess Ecological Injustice Hotspots for Targeted Urban Design and Planning of Nature-Based Solutions
Reference

Pineda-Pinto M.; Frantzeskaki N.; Chandrabose M.; Herreros-Cantis P.; McPhearson T.; Nygaard C.A.; Raymond C. Planning Ecologically Just Cities: A Framework to Assess Ecological Injustice Hotspots for Targeted Urban Design and Planning of Nature-Based Solutions,Urban Policy and Research 40 3

Keywords
Link to article https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85137686218&doi=10.1080%2f08111146.2022.2093184&partnerID=40&md5=157f6d49b7c4eb649ff3905bc8cd662b
Abstract This paper presents a typology of ecological injustice hotspots for targeted design of nature-based solutions to guide planning and designing of just cities. The typology demonstrates how the needs and capabilities of nonhuman nature can be embedded within transitions to multi- and interspecies relational futures that regenerate and protect urban social-ecological systems. We synthesise the findings of previous quantitative and qualitative analyses to develop the Ecologically Just Cities Framework that (1) works as a diagnostic tool to characterise four types of urban ecological injustices and (2) identifies nature-based planning actions that can best respond to different types of place-based ecological injustices. © 2022 Editorial Board, Urban Policy and Research.

Metodology

Technique

Keyword Find research methods used
Tentative Keyword Show Candidate Transition Variables for article (AI method)
Categories Find category for article (AI method)
Crossover theme Find social impact for article (AI method)
Wordcloud Show WordCloud from article (AI method)
Find semantically similar articles Find semantically similar articles (Semantic search)