| Id | 2171 | |
| Author | Liu Y.; Jin X.; Dupre K. | |
| Title | Engaging stakeholders in contested urban heritage planning and management | |
| Reference | Liu Y.; Jin X.; Dupre K. Engaging stakeholders in contested urban heritage planning and management,Cities 122 |
|
| Link to article | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85119612049&doi=10.1016%2fj.cities.2021.103521&partnerID=40&md5=ee9e18ba798083d217f7315144565de1 |
|
| Abstract | Urban heritage anchors the identity and culture of cities and is a key element in the development of a sense of place. However, when cities experience socio-spatial transformation, urban heritage may be demolished, particularly in historic urban neighbourhoods. Owing to conflicting claims, representations, and discourse, urban heritage often becomes contested—a situation that is usually approached through the engagement of stakeholders in a collaborative planning process. The Dongguan Street precinct in Dalian, China, is an abandoned historical neighbourhood that was scheduled for redevelopment but is now being considered for a level of preservation. It represents an excellent example of contested urban heritage, which will be explored in this research. Through analysis of Dongguan Street stakeholders' perceptions, interests, roles, and interactions in the heritage planning process, the various issues and opportunities pertaining to stakeholder engagement were identified. Strategies are presented to mitigate stakeholder conflicts and support the collaborative planning of urban heritage. The results expand the understanding of stakeholder engagement in contested urban heritage planning and management. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd |
|
Results:
Smaller Distance better similarity
| Id | View | Author | Title | Distance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2208 |  |
Anelli D.; Tajani F. | Valorization of cultural heritage and land take reduction: an urban compensation model for the replacement of unsuitable buildings in an Italian UNESCO site | 86.8505 |
| 2181 | |
Li J.; Dai T.; Yin S.; Zhao Y.; Ikiz Kaya D.; Yang L. | Promoting conservation or change? The UNESCO label of world heritage (re)shaping urban morphology in the Old Town of Lijiang, China | 99.2889 |
| 2175 | |
Lam-Knott S. | Contested Meanings of Urban Heritage in Hong Kong | 106.011 |
| 2176 | |
Law A.M. | Historical imaginaries, historic urban branding, and the local state in China: rejuvenation discourse, manufactured heritage and simulacrascapes | 107.08 |
| 2190 | |
Cermeño H.; Mielke K. | Endangered Urban Commons: Lahore’s Violent Heritage Management and Prospects for Reconciliation | 107.22 |
| 2078 | |
Burgum S. | This City Is An Archive: Squatting History and Urban Authority | 114.946 |
| 2782 | |
Nikoofam M.; Hoşkara S. | Assessing the Consolidation of Equity in the Urban Environment: Proposing Design Strategies by Using a Systematic Process | 115.135 |
| 2825 | |
Elshater A.; Abusaada H. | Effects of nightlife activities on urban spaces and design: a case study of Cairo, Egypt | 115.214 |
| 2202 | |
Eckardt F.; Alsadaty A. | Urban Heritage in Transformation: Physical and Non-Physical Dimensions of Changing Contexts | 115.338 |
| 2044 | |
Vardopoulos I. | Industrial building adaptive reuse for museum. Factors affecting visitors’ perceptions of the sustainable urban development potential | 118.253 |
MESOC has received funding
from Horizon 2020 - the EU Framework Programme
for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) -
under Grant Agreement n°870935.
We take your privacy seriously and WE DO NOT process any personal data or any information that reveals personal identity or information that can be linked to such information to identify directly or indirectly.
2021 © CD