| Id | 2185 | |
| Author | Kashihara S.; Nguyen V.D.Q.; Suzuki N. | |
| Title | Exploring Measures for Urban Heritage Conservation in Its Early Stages A comparative study between Ho Chi Minh City and Yokohama City | |
| Reference | Kashihara S.; Nguyen V.D.Q.; Suzuki N. Exploring Measures for Urban Heritage Conservation in Its Early Stages A comparative study between Ho Chi Minh City and Yokohama City,International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development 10 3 |
|
| Link to article | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85135068827&doi=10.14246%2firspsd.10.3_213&partnerID=40&md5=aae7f9c8bd0940c1f15a23ccdb4e8d71 |
|
| Abstract | This study proposes measures to improve urban heritage conservation in the central area of Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), Vietnam, by comparing it with Yokohama City (YC), Japan. Based on the past literature on the development stages of urban heritage management, two aspects critical for successful heritage conservation—legal framework and management structure—were examined. The common drawbacks associated with these two aspects and the countermeasures taken for advancement in the early stages of heritage conservation in the two cities were compared. In addition to policy analysis, indepth interviews with officials and experts were conducted to collect data between 2013 and 2015. The results show that while both cities faced the need for legalisation in the first stage of their heritage conservation, YC could systematically move to the second stage to accelerate its legislative process and establish an urban design division and an external expert team. In the second stage, both cities lacked powerful incentives and enforcement, but YC has supplemented its enforcement measures, persistent negotiation and coordination activities to actively apply its incentives. The solutions for HCMC focus on proposing additional incentives and sanctions to enable its Department of Planning and Architecture officials to effectively negotiate with owners and investors and develop a legal framework while conducting pilot projects to inform legalisation. An urban conservation team within the government to collaborate with organisations specialised in conservation is also proposed to improve the city's management structure. © 2022. Press from, SPSD Press, Kanazawa. All Rights Reserved. |
|
Results:
Smaller Distance better similarity
| Id | View | Author | Title | Distance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2694 |  |
Acar Y.; Demet G.; Kaynar M. | Data and discourse: an assessment of Taksim urban design competition in terms of populism and participation | 94.2384 |
| 2904 | |
Jóźwik R.; Jóźwik A. | Influence of environmental factors on urban and architectural design—Example of a former paper mill in nanterre | 95.3545 |
| 2737 | |
Benyus J.; Dwyer J.; El-Sayed S.; Hayes S.; Baumeister D.; Penick C.A. | Ecological performance standards for regenerative urban design | 98.2529 |
| 2827 | |
Kim J.Y.; Kim J.H. | Urban Regeneration Involving Communication between University Students and Residents: A Case Study on the Student Village Design Project | 98.5934 |
| 2181 | |
Li J.; Dai T.; Yin S.; Zhao Y.; Ikiz Kaya D.; Yang L. | Promoting conservation or change? The UNESCO label of world heritage (re)shaping urban morphology in the Old Town of Lijiang, China | 99.2412 |
| 3010 | |
Pineo H.; Moore G.; Braithwaite I. | Incorporating practitioner knowledge to test and improve a new conceptual framework for healthy urban design and planning | 99.9113 |
| 2953 | |
Semeraro T.; Scarano A.; Pandey R. | Ecosystem Services Analysis and Design through Nature-Based Solutions in Urban Planning at a Neighbourhood Scale | 104.156 |
| 2941 | |
Mrđenović T. | AESTHETIC COMMUNICATION DISCOURSE OF URBAN DESIGN FOR FOURTH ORDER DESIGN IN SUSTAINABLE URBAN REGENERATION | 104.256 |
| 2916 | |
Pineda-Pinto M.; Frantzeskaki N.; Chandrabose M.; Herreros-Cantis P.; McPhearson T.; Nygaard C.A.; Raymond C. | Planning Ecologically Just Cities: A Framework to Assess Ecological Injustice Hotspots for Targeted Urban Design and Planning of Nature-Based Solutions | 104.92 |
| 2169 | |
Ornelas C.; Guedes J.M.; Breda‐vázquez I.; Guinea V.G.; Turri A. | Urban Heritage Rehabilitation: Institutional Stakeholders’ Contributions to Improve Implementation of Urban and Building Regulations | 105.355 |
MESOC has received funding
from Horizon 2020 - the EU Framework Programme
for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) -
under Grant Agreement n°870935.
We take your privacy seriously and WE DO NOT process any personal data or any information that reveals personal identity or information that can be linked to such information to identify directly or indirectly.
2021 © CD