| Id | 127 | |
| Author | Kalergis, D., | |
| Title | The role of architecture in culture-led urban regeneration strategies | |
| Reference | Kalergis, D. (2008). The role of architecture in culture-led urban regeneration strategies. In Malikova, L. and Sirak, M. (eds.). Regional and Urban Regeneration in European Peripheries: What Role for Culture?, p.21-34. Institute of Public Policy: Bratislava |
|
| Link to article | https://www.academia.edu/1991637/THE_ROLE_OF_ARCHITECTURE_IN_CULTURE-LED_URBAN_REGENERATION_STRATEGIES?auto=download&email_work_card=download-paper |
|
| Abstract | Culture is a central theme in most urban regeneration strategies. In spite of its quite complex and
somewhat abstract nature, it certainly is a catalyst of economic and social potentials. The cultural industry,
meaning the market of production, promotion and consumption of culture and its products, is usually
regarded as the most promising mechanism of urban development. It is intentionally supported by distinct
production of urban space, offering a ‘great panorama’ that exalts the experience and behaviour of
participants; namely consumers. Unlike traditional practices, where harmonization of content, function and
architectural style were crucial, contemporary and innovative architectural practices are concentrated on
values of impressiveness, distinctiveness and surprise of form. This economic driven role of culture drifts an
architectural current of an unusual spatial experience and symbolism, setting off new design challenges and
spatial experimentations, as well as it raises concerns. This paper emphasizes this growing importance and
contribution of architectural symbolism to the development of local identity, local economy and place
promotion. |
|
Results:
Smaller Distance better similarity
| Id | View | Author | Title | Distance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 107 |  |
Evans, G., | Measure for measure: evaluating the evidence of culture’s contribution to regeneration. | 80.2325 |
| 201 | |
Stern, M., J.; Seifert, S., C. | Cultural Clusters: The Implications of Cultural Assets Agglomeration for Neighborhood Revitalization | 92.6068 |
| 148 | |
Gainza, X., | Culture‑led neighbourhood transformations beyond the revitalisation/gentrification dichotomy. | 94.6983 |
| 150 | |
Markusen , A., ; Godwa, A., | Arts and Culture in Urban or Regional Planning: A Review and Research Agenda | 103.899 |
| 167 | |
Tavano Blessi, G.; Grossi, E.; Sacco, P. L.; Piereti, G.; Ferilli, G. | The contribution of cultural participation to urban well-being. A comparative study in Bolzano/Bozen and Siracusa, Italy | 104.337 |
| 144 | |
Blessi, G.T., ; Tremblay , D., G.; Sandri, M., ; Pilati, T., | New trajectories in urban regeneration processes: Cultural capital as source of human and social capital accumulation – Evidence from the case of Tohu in Montreal | 104.339 |
| 849 | |
Barelkowski R. | Involving social participation in the preservation of heritage: The experience of Greater Poland and Kujavia | 105.464 |
| 159 | |
García, B., | Urban Regeneration, Arts Programming and Major Events: Glasgow 1990, Sydney 2000 and Barcelona 2004 | 108.308 |
| 642 | |
Mckenzie M., Hutton T. | Culture-led Regeneration in the Post-industrial Built Environment: Complements and Contradictions in Victory Square, Vancouver | 108.901 |
| 208 | |
Badham, M., | Cultural Indicators: Tools for Community Engagement? | 109.127 |
MESOC has received funding
from Horizon 2020 - the EU Framework Programme
for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) -
under Grant Agreement n°870935.
We take your privacy seriously and WE DO NOT process any personal data or any information that reveals personal identity or information that can be linked to such information to identify directly or indirectly.
2021 © CD